Jameson v. Arrow Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring plaintiff in RIF case to present “evidence by which a fact finder could reasonably conclude that the employer intended to discriminate on the basis of age”
• “[W]here a job for which the plaintiff is qualified, and for which the plaintiff applies, is available at the time of termination, and the employer offers the job to an individual outside the protected age group, an inference of intentional discrimination is permissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).