James Williams, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Valentec Kisco, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that “the McDonnell Douglas ‘ritual is not well suited as a detailed This court agreed. Holding that there was no error in instruction to the jury’ . . .”
• affirming the district court’s refusal to include the burden-shifting test in its jury instructions
• no requirement that party need to request front pay to have it addressed so long as reinstatement is raised
• no requirement that party need to. request front pay to have it addressed so long as reinstatement is raised
• request for reinstatement not required to obtain front pay; front pay may be appropriate where there is hostility between the parties
• comment about “old man carrying the boxes” could be considered direct evidence of discriminatory intent, and provided an independent basis to support the jury's finding of pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).