James Wilbert Stewart v. Credit Bureau, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a CRA was required to initially verify furnished information because it was inconsistent with the consumer’s credit history
• holding a CRA was required to initially verify furnished information because it was inconsistent with the consumer’s credit history
• determining that the plaintiff properly defeated summary judgment by demonstrating that his credit report erroneously contained an unfavorable entry
• determining that the plaintiff properly defeated summary judgment by demonstrating that his credit report erroneously contained an unfavorable entry
• observing that “inconsistencies within a single file or report ... can provide sufficient grounds for inferring that an agency acted negligently in failing to verify information,” where the plaintiff pointed to a wage-earner plan entry that was “facially inconsistent with the rest of his file”
• denying summary judgment because there were genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the agency followed reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of the report and whether the inaccuracy caused the denial of consumer membership

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).