· 7/27/2006
James Washington v. Paul Renico, Warden
Citations
- 455 F.3d 722
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18747
- 2006 WL 2077006
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that bald assertions and conclusory 14 allegations do not provide a basis for an evidentiary hearing on habeas review
- holding that bald assertions and conclusory allegations do not provide a basis for an evidentiary hearing on habeas review
- holding that bald assertions and conclusory allegations do not provide a basis for an evidentiary hearing on habeas review
- stating that bald assertions and conclusory allegations do not provide a basis for an evidentiary hearing on habeas review
- explaining that bald assertions and conclusory allegations do not provide a basis for an evidentiary hearing on habeas review
- explaining that bald assertions and conclusory allegations do not provide a basis for an evidentiary hearing on habeas review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Siler, Daughtrey, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.