· 7/25/1995
James W. Felt v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Citations
- 60 F.3d 1416
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5807
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 9897
- 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2991
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19349
- 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 548
- 1995 WL 434483
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the RLA does not preclude litigation where the merits of a litigant’s federal claim cannot be “conclusively resolved merely by consulting the CBA”
- noting a Title VII claim exists independent of the CBA
- RLA does not preclude Title VII claims
- RLA does not preclude Title VII claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Kleinfeld, King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.