James W. Brown v. David R. Harris, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Brown cites no case indicating that [C.P.L. §710.30], or that a notice requirement in general, is constitutionally mandated.”
• “[A]ppellant claims that it was reversible error to admit the identification testimony without giving him advance notice [under § 710.30].... Brown cites no case indicating that this statute, or that a notice requirement in general, is constitutionally mandated.”
• “[A]ppellant claims that it was reversible error to admit the identification testimony without giving him advance notice [under § 710.30].... Brown cites no case indicating that this statute, or that a notice requirement in general, is constitutionally mandated.”
• “Witnesses who listen to a crime that has been ‘memorialized on tape,’ are in a position to offer uniquely reliable testimony. . . . [T]hey have the luxury of listening to the tape in an office, where they can devote their full attention to it.” (citations omitted)
• witnesses had interviewed defendant– petitioner for “many hours”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).