Skip to main content
· 10/26/1992

James v. Whirlpool Corp.

Citations

  • 806 F. Supp. 835
  • 1992 WL 309654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the plaintiff failed to establish the indirect payment of a franchise fee where it presented no evidence that the inventory requirements were unreasonable
  • concluding that the plaintiff failed to establish the indirect payment of a franchise fee where it presented no evidence that the inventory requirements were unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Limbaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.