James v. Vance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where the amount in controversy was unknown by the parties and there was no identifiable account or piece of property from which money was to be paid, an action for civil theft did not lie
• finding no civil theft action will lie for action brought by subcontractor on construction project against general contractor for payment of services rendered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).