· 8/29/2012
James v. Valdez
Citations
- 378 S.W.3d 644
- 2012 WL 3728015
- 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 7273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is irrelevant to a claim of retaliation that the act complained of was not legally actionable.”
- MHRA retaliation claim requires an adverse action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morris, Moseley, Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.