Skip to main content
· 8/29/2012

James v. Valdez

Citations

  • 378 S.W.3d 644
  • 2012 WL 3728015
  • 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 7273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is irrelevant to a claim of retaliation that the act complained of was not legally actionable.”
  • MHRA retaliation claim requires an adverse action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morris, Moseley, Myers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.