· 2/23/2007
James v. U.S. Customs & Border Protection
Citations
- 474 F. Supp. 2d 154
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying summary judgment without prejudice because CBP “[made] no further attempt at all to explain why TECS is the exclusive source of potentially responsive material”
- denying summary judgment without prejudice because CBP “[made] no further attempt at all to explain why TECS is the exclusive source of potentially responsive material”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.