Skip to main content
· 7/28/1998

James v. Union Electric Co.

Citations

  • 978 S.W.2d 372
  • 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1459
  • 1998 WL 419458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the circuit court erred in dismissing plaintiffs claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because repair of a line on a utility pole is the repair of an improvement- — the utility pole was an improvement to the land — so the exception was triggered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pudlowski, Grimm, Gaertner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.