Skip to main content
· 10/22/1913

James v. Tindall

Citations

  • 27 Del. 413
  • 4 Boyce 413
  • 88 A. 1003
  • 1913 Del. LEXIS 55

Syllabus

<p>Animals—Action for Trespass—Defense.</p> <p>It was no defense to an action for the killing of turkeys and chickens that they were on defendant’s property destroying grain, since defendant might have impounded them or brought an action for damages.</p>

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.