· 10/22/1913
James v. Tindall
Citations
- 27 Del. 413
- 4 Boyce 413
- 88 A. 1003
- 1913 Del. LEXIS 55
Syllabus
<p>Animals—Action for Trespass—Defense.</p> <p>It was no defense to an action for the killing of turkeys and chickens that they were on defendant’s property destroying grain, since defendant might have impounded them or brought an action for damages.</p>
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.