James v. Tibbetts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “None of the discovery mentioned by Plaintiffs could have raised a fact issue material to the determination of the jurisdictional plea.”
• determination of jurisdictional issue was based on “the statutory language, the allegations in Plaintiffs’ pleadings, and basic documents”
• same where “[n]one of the discovery mentioned by Plaintiffs could have raised a fact issue material to the determination of the jurisdictional plea”
• “None of the discovery mentioned by Plaintiffs could have raised a fact issue material to the determination of the jurisdictional plea.”
• “[A] pensioner in a statutory pension plan does not have a vested right to his pension.”
• noting subjective views are irrelevant to questions of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).