Skip to main content
· 7/7/1992

James v. Texas Department of Human Services

Citations

  • 836 S.W.2d 236
  • 1992 WL 151954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellate court excluded improperly admitted evidence, including videotape that was not provided in discovery, from sufficiency review
  • “The burden of showing prejudice or surprise rests on the party resisting the amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Bleil, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.