· 7/7/1992
James v. Texas Department of Human Services
Citations
- 836 S.W.2d 236
- 1992 WL 151954
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appellate court excluded improperly admitted evidence, including videotape that was not provided in discovery, from sufficiency review
- “The burden of showing prejudice or surprise rests on the party resisting the amendment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cornelius, Bleil, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.