James v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s prior convictions for grand larceny, theft, and forgery were all crimes involving dishonesty and therefore admissible under Rule 609 without weighing the prejudicial effect
• holding that a prior conviction for theft involved dishonesty pursuant to Rule 609 and that there was no requirement that the trial court weigh and consider the prejudicial effect
• stating that prior convictions for theft, grand larceny, and forgery all involved dishonesty
• stating that prior convictions for theft, grand larceny, and forgery all involved dishonesty
• grand larceny and theft are crimes involving dishonesty
• grand larceny and theft are crimes involving dishonesty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Adams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-27· cited 31×
• Webster v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-12-10· cited 23×
• State v. Anderson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 18×
• Washington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1982-09-08· cited 17×
• Edwards v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-10-26· cited 15×
• Rogers v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2018-10-25· cited 10×
• Rogers v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2018-07-12· cited 2×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2017-10-18· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gustafson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-12-03· cited 56×
• McCree v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-09-10· cited 35×
• Heard v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-03-09· cited 26×
• Golden v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-02-19· cited 25×