James v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the Salinas test in the context of a timely post-conviction relief application raising a newly discovered evidence claim under Criminal Rule 35.1(a)(4)
• remanding timely post-conviction application because the superior court failed to make the necessary finding of “whether the newly discovered evidence would probably produce an acquittal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cameron v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2007-11-30· cited 19×
• Johnson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2010-01-22· cited 9×
• Smart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-10-27· cited 8×
• Morgan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-07-28· cited 4×
• Terry Anthony Clayton v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-08-18· cited 2×
• Gregory Marino v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2025-08-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Andrew Pitts v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1959-03-12· cited 52×
• Beavers v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1971-12-30· cited 52×
• Hensel v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-12-07· cited 50×
• Salinas v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1962-06-30· cited 45×
• Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-10-12· cited 40×
• Martin v. Martin
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2002-07-19· cited 26×
• Shapiro v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1990-06-01· cited 3×
• James v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2002-06-28· cited 2×