Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1/16/1969
James v. State
Citations
- 248 A.2d 910
- 5 Md. App. 647
- 1969 Md. App. LEXIS 480
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Although hearsay, it may be afforded the same probative force as if competent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Anderson, Morton, Orth, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lamb v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-01· cited 85×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-04-06· cited 27×
- Worthen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-03-22· cited 14×
- Dyson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-04-01· cited 12×
- Schmitt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-08-31· cited 10×
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-03-19· cited 9×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-08-08· cited 6×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-04-27· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.