Skip to main content

James v. State

Citations

  • 565 S.E.2d 802
  • 275 Ga. 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the juvenile defendant knowingly and intelligently waived her rights “[c]onsidering the totality of the circumstances,” but noting that the trial court “consider[ed] the nine factors set forth in Riley”
  • failure to reserve objections is not deficient performance where evidence did not authorize the charge appellant claims should have been given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.