James v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s right to a speedy trial under Rule 45 is irrevocably waived if no speedy trial objection is raised prior to the beginning of trial, regardless of whether good cause existed for the lack of objection
• holding that a defendant's right to a speedy trial under Rule 45 is irrevocably waived if no speedy trial objection is raised prior to the beginning of trial, regardless of whether good cause existed for the lack of objection
• concluding defendant forfeited right to complain of speedy trial rule violation by failing to complain before voir dire
• counsel did not realize date of arrest until after the beginning of voir dire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hoey
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-09-22· cited 163×
• Yearty v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-02-15· cited 42×
• James v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-02-02· cited 19×
• Andrew v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-01-25· cited 14×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-11-05· cited 12×
• Trudeau v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-02-14· cited 10×
• Conway v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-10-17· cited 4×
• Ray v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1990-06-15
• Office of Public Advocacy v. Superior Court, First Judicial District
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2025-02-14

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Selman v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1965-10-04· cited 32×
• Koehler v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-02-22· cited 30×