· 3/30/1998
James v. McCoy
Citations
- 56 F. Supp. 2d 919
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22495
- 1998 WL 1073804
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the provisions of Section 523 “do not create a private right of action, but merely set forth the criteria that a bankruptcy court must follow in determining dischargeability of debts”
- claimant barred from recovery because he failed to bring his claim within one year of discovery as required under Section 1336.09(A)
- “Although [Ohio’s preference statute] does not expressly contain a limitations period, Ohio Courts have interpreted the statute ... to have a limitations period of four years following discovery.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.