Skip to main content
· 3/30/1998

James v. McCoy

Citations

  • 56 F. Supp. 2d 919
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22495
  • 1998 WL 1073804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the provisions of Section 523 “do not create a private right of action, but merely set forth the criteria that a bankruptcy court must follow in determining dischargeability of debts”
  • claimant barred from recovery because he failed to bring his claim within one year of discovery as required under Section 1336.09(A)
  • “Although [Ohio’s preference statute] does not expressly contain a limitations period, Ohio Courts have interpreted the statute ... to have a limitations period of four years following discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.