Supreme Court of Colorado· 4/7/1924
James v. James
Citations
- 75 Colo. 164
- 225 P. 208
- 1924 Colo. LEXIS 357
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[S]uits to cancel deeds are not for the recovery of lands, within the meaning of the . . . statute of limitations.” (citations omitted)
- “Ordinarily where a statute of limitations is stayed during the pendency of legal proceedings or litigation, the statute begins to run from the date of the final judgment in such proceedings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Irving Place Associates v. 628 Park Ave, LLCUtah Supreme Court· 2015-11-13· cited 10×
- Haffke v. LinkerColorado Court of Appeals· 1971-11-08· cited 6×
- Irving Place v. 628 Park AveUtah Supreme Court· 2015-11-13· cited 2×
- Tyroshi Investments, LLC v. U.S. Bank, NA, Successor Trustee to LaSalle Bank NADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-09-11
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Murray v. McGuireSupreme Court of Georgia· 1907-08-14· cited 14×
- Mexican Nat. Coal, Timber & Iron Co. v. FrankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Texas· 1907-04-23· cited 5×
- Studebaker Corp. v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-01-12· cited 1×
- Boulanger v. HetzelSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1910-11-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.