Skip to main content

James v. James

Citations

  • 75 Colo. 164
  • 225 P. 208
  • 1924 Colo. LEXIS 357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[S]uits to cancel deeds are not for the recovery of lands, within the meaning of the . . . statute of limitations.” (citations omitted)
  • “Ordinarily where a statute of limitations is stayed during the pendency of legal proceedings or litigation, the statute begins to run from the date of the final judgment in such proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.