James v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the legislature did not specify that only non-custodial parents are to pay child support
• holding that the legislature did not specify that only non-custodial parents are to pay child support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Office of the Attorney General v. Buhrle
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2007-01-18· cited 17×
• Williamson v. Williamson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-10-07· cited 5×
• Rowden v. Rowden
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-11-07· cited 3×
• Office of the Attorney General v. Sharon W. Buhrle
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-11-22

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Summers v. Summers
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1956-10-09· cited 9×
• Atkins v. Zachary
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-04-05· cited 8×