James v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]ursuant to the doctrine of ‘reasonable expectations,’ when one has paid separate premiums on separate vehicles, he may reasonably expect to be able to stack those coverages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. Hatfield
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2003-12-18· cited 24×
• Burton v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2010-11-05· cited 7×
• Consol. Ins. Co. v. Slone
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2018-01-05· cited 4×
• Peterson v. Grange Prop. & Cas.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2018-10-26
• Johnny Caudill v. Daily Underwriters of America, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2024-11-15

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sturdy v. Allied Mutual Insurance
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1969-07-17· cited 134×
• Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North America
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1972-06-12· cited 107×
• Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Stanfield
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1979-03-20· cited 82×
• Pyle v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-09-20· cited 74×
• Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1976-03-26· cited 68×
• Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. Siddons
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1970-04-23· cited 66×
• Chaffin v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance Companies
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1990-04-26· cited 46×
• Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dicke
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1993-09-30· cited 44×
• Lawson v. Loid
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1995-05-11· cited 38×
• Hamilton v. Allstate Insurance Co.
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1990-04-26· cited 34×
• Old Reliable Insurance Co. v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1977-11-18· cited 15×