James v. James
Citations
- 35 Wash. 650
- 77 P. 1080
- 1904 Wash. LEXIS 493
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Decision. Upon a trial de novo on appeal, tlie judgment of the lower court may he sustained on other grounds than those adopted hy the trial judge.</p> <p>Adoption — Requisites—Recording Agreement Under Laws oe Foreign State — Descent and Distribution. An adoption in the state of Iowa hy a written agreement which is not recorded, as required hy the laws of that state, is invalid under the decisions in that state, and such an agreement of adoption, unaccompanied hy due proof of recording in Iowa, is insufficient to show any interest in real estate under the law of descent and distribution.</p> <p>Evidence — Recording—Certificate of Officer — Foreign Record. A certificate of the official keeper of a record in another state endorsed upon the hack of an instrument required to he recorded in such state, is not sufficient to prove the fact of the recording of such instrument.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1908-10-15· cited 25×
- State v. KniffenWashington Supreme Court· 1906-11-24· cited 11×
- Gilbert Co. v. HustedWashington Supreme Court· 1908-07-15· cited 8×
- Beers v. MerrillWashington Supreme Court· 1914-03-25· cited 6×
- Succession of MarquetteLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1964-07-15· cited 5×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.