Skip to main content

James v. James

Citations

  • 768 So. 2d 356
  • 2000 WL 92256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that letters from minority shareholder and his attorney, even if not sufficient to constitute demands for suit, supported the conclusion “that any further demand would be futile”
  • a minority shareholder cannot parlay a wrong committed primarily against the corporation, which gives rise to a derivative claim only, into a personal recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Houston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.