Skip to main content
· 6/20/1908

James v. Helm

Citations

  • 129 Ky. 323
  • 111 S.W. 335
  • 1908 Ky. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The bottom line is protected opinion exists if ‘[t]he reader is in as good a position as the author to judge whether the conclusion ... [i]s correct.’”
  • a single plaintiff physician could not support her defamation claim based on “remarks about the medical profession” because “a member of a class has no claim against someone defaming the class as a whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lassing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.