Skip to main content
· 2/12/2004

James v. Gruma Corp.

Citations

  • 129 S.W.3d 755
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 1421
  • 2004 WL 254265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the duty of diligence in service begins on the “date suit is filed”
  • stating that the duty of diligence in service begins on the “date suit is filed”
  • stating that the duty of diligence in service begins on the A date suit is filed @
  • complaint about service barred when appearance made within limitations period
  • affirming summary judgment based on unexplained six-month delay
  • affirming summary judgment based on unexplained six-month delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Livingston, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.