James v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]efendants did 28 not lose the present right of repossession merely because James said she did not want the car taken away.”
• “[D]efendants did not lose the present right of possession merely because James said she did not want the car taken away.”
• “Automobile finance companies which make loans to automobile purchasers do not have as their principal business purpose the collection of debts and they do not generally collect debts due to others.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).