James v. County of Kitsap

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that imposition of impact fees as a condition for the issuance of a building permit is a land use decision
• holding that the imposition of impact fees as a condition on a building permit was unreviewable absent a timely challenge to the permit
• holding that the imposition of impact fees as a condition on the issuance of a building permits was a land use decision subject to LUPA
• recognizing that the Land Use Petition Act, RCW 36.70C.030(1) establishes uniform procedures by its own terms and is the exclusive means of land use decisions
• “[S]tate courts have required substantial compliance or satisfaction of the spirit of the procedural requirements before they will exercise jurisdiction over the matter.”
• both stressing importance of complying with time limits in the land use context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).