James v. Carmick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that because the damages awarded to plaintiffs were for money not subject to taxation, the award was not grossed up because it had already been taxed
• declining to gross-up an award when the money may not have been subject to taxation and a gross-up could result in a windfall to plaintiff
• “It has been held that foreseeable financing costs can be an element of expectancy damages.”
• “The need for gross-up assumes ... that any recovery here is taxable.”
• denying a comparable gross-up claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).