Skip to main content
· 8/18/2004

James v. AT & T CORP.

Citations

  • 334 F. Supp. 2d 410
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16611
  • 2004 WL 1872705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Filing a second identical action . . . is [not] an appropriate way to gain a more advantageous statute of limitations.”
  • district court may dismiss duplicative suits where claims, parties and relief do not significantly differ between the two actions as part of its general powers to administer its docket

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stanton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.