James v. Arlington County Board of Supervisors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a meaningful hearing is one “appropriate to the nature of his case”
• holding that the Virginia Industrial Commission was correct “in its approach” in a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits that “made ‘first things first’ and ruled on its jurisdiction as a threshold matter”
• no violation of due process where oral argument was denied and views expressed in writing
• in a procedural context, claimant held bound by a position he advanced in writing to the Commission with the assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).