James v. Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Maddox, J., concurring in the result but dissenting from the rationale, noting that [the Equity Funding] case involves `a debate about the doctrine of separation of powers among coordinate, independent branches of state government and about whether certain orders were \final\ or not'
• Maddox, J., concurring in the result but dissenting from the rationale, noting that this case involves “a debate about the doctrine of separation of powers among coordinate, independent branches of state government and about whether certain orders were ‘final’ or not”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).