James T. Crues v. Kfc Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party could not “recover $250 for use of a special process server, because 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (1982) contains no provision for such expenses.”
• 28 U.S.C. § 1920 contains no provision for the use of special process servers, thus such costs are non-taxable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).