Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts may exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Magnuson-Moss claims
• finding that a breach of a contract, in of itself, is not a per se unconscionable business practice and may not, alone, violate the NJCFA
• noting that, when calculating amount in controversy, court should include treble damages
• noting district court, on remand, \can exercise supplemental jurisdiction\ over 15 MMWA claim if it finds plaintiff \has established diversity jurisdiction with his [state law] 16 claim\
• allowing a plaintiff to use the NJCFA’s treble damages provision to influence the amount-in-controversy calculation only when he is not “precluded to a legal certainty from recovering under the NJCFA”
• allowing a plaintiff to use the CFA’s treble damages provision to influence the amount-in-controversy calculation only when he is not “precluded to a legal certainty from recovering under the NJCFA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).