Skip to main content
· 6/22/1993

James Small, Jr. v. Superintendent Jeff Endicott and Kenosha County Circuit Court, 1

Citations

  • 998 F.2d 411
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15010
  • 1993 WL 217059

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant had no right to attend scheduling hearing where court made no adverse ruling
  • holding that defendant had no right to attend scheduling hearing where court made no adverse ruling
  • “[A] federal court is not required to construct legal arguments for a pro se petitioner.”
  • “[A] federal court is not required to construct legal arguments for a pro se petitioner.”
  • “[A] federal court is not required to construct legal arguments for a pro se petitioner.”
  • “[A] federal court is not required to construct legal arguments for a pro se petitioner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Flaum, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.