James Scroggins v. University of Minnesota the University of Minnesota Police Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the employee had presented “no evidence suggesting anything other than the [employer’s] honest belief’
• holding that the “relevant inquiry” in retaliation case is whether the employer believed the employee was guilty of the conduct justifying discharge
• holding the “relevant inquiry” in retaliation case is whether the employer believed the employee was guilty of the conduct justifying discharge
• holding the \relevant inquiry\ in retaliation case is whether the employer believed the employee was guilty of the conduct justifying discharge
• finding Plaintiff failed to prove pretext because there was “no evidence suggesting anything other than the [employer’s] honest belief”
• affirming a grant of summary judgment for employer in race discrimination case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).