Skip to main content
· 8/1/2012

James Schottel, Jr. v. Patrick Young

Citations

  • 687 F.3d 370
  • 2012 WL 3101689
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a judge rules on a motion, it is done in a judicial capacity
  • holding that a judge is immune from suit, except for non-judicial actions or for actions taken absent all jurisdiction
  • holding that a judge is immune from suit, except for non-judicial actions or for actions taken absent all jurisdiction
  • holding that a judge is immune from suit, except for non-judicial actions or for actions taken absent all jurisdiction
  • holding a hearing on a motion, ruling on the motion, and requiring certain conditions be met before granting the motion “are all acts normally performed by a judge”
  • holding hearings and ruling on motions are “all acts normally performed by a judge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Beam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.