James Sample v. Richard Schweiker , Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that it is the vocational expert’s role to 22 translate factual scenarios into realistic job market probabilities, not to determine 23 the validity of medical opinions
• maintaining that resolution of conflicts in the evidence are the sole function of the || Commissioner
• noting that an ALJ is the appropriate judge of the weight of the medical evidence in formulating hypotheticals for vocational assessment
• explaining that an ALJ may “draw inferences logically flowing from the evidence”
• lim-iting appellate review to determining whether a reasonable mind could accept the ALJ’s conclusion
• limiting appellate review to determining whether a reasonable mind could accept the ALJ's conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).