JAMES S. WINDER, Former Husband v. Dian A. Winder, Former Wife

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court’s failure to make adequate factual findings is “‘typically reversible error because, in most circumstances, this failure precludes meaningful appellate review’” (quoting Winney v. Winney, 979 So.2d 396, 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008))
• reversing alimony award \because the trial court failed to -2- expressly find that no other form of alimony would be appropriate before awarding permanent alimony\
• the lack of sufficient factual findings regarding the former wife’s financial resources and current living expenses as required by section 61.08 precluded meaningful review of the alimony award
• the lack of sufficient factual findings regarding the former wife’s financial resources and current living expenses as required by section 61.08 precluded meaningful review of the alimony award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).