James Rush v. University of Virginia Health System/Commonwealth of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting it is “axiomatic that when the language of a statute is unambiguous, we are bound by that language and will not add words to the statute” that will expand its scope (quoting Seguin v. Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp., 277 Va. 244, 248 (2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).