James Rose v. Michael P. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Falconer found the instructions to be \gravely erroneous\ and \inherently prejudicial\
• noting that Falconer found the instructions to be \gravely erroneous\ and \inherently prejudicial\
• noting that Falconer found the instructions to he \gravely erroneous” and \inherently prejudicial”
• “we must decide ... whether the trial court’s constitutional error was harmless,” id at 403
• “the court did not state that it was relying on waiver 9 or that it reached the plain error analysis only as an alternative ground for dismissing Rose’s claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).