· 9/15/1992
James Robert Swofford v. Sheriff Charles F. Mandrell
Citations
- 969 F.2d 547
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that courts may assess additional materials prepared by a pro se plaintiff to enable a thorough evaluation of the merits
- indicating that courts may assess additional materials prepared by a pro se plaintiff to enable a thorough evaluation of the merits
- noting that the placement of a plaintiff who had been charged with sexual assault in a cell with ten other inmates who had been charged with other crimes supports conclusion that defendant custodian acted with deliberate indifference
- “[T]he court should consider allegations contained in the other court filings of a pro se plaintiff.”
- \[T]he court should consider allegations contained in the other court filings of a pro se plaintiff.\
- “A pretrial detainee’s right not to be punished is at least as expansive as a convicted prisoner’s freedom from cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Kanne, Eschbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.