Skip to main content
· 9/15/1992

James Robert Swofford v. Sheriff Charles F. Mandrell

Citations

  • 969 F.2d 547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that courts may assess additional materials prepared by a pro se plaintiff to enable a thorough evaluation of the merits
  • indicating that courts may assess additional materials prepared by a pro se plaintiff to enable a thorough evaluation of the merits
  • noting that the placement of a plaintiff who had been charged with sexual assault in a cell with ten other inmates who had been charged with other crimes supports conclusion that defendant custodian acted with deliberate indifference
  • “[T]he court should consider allegations contained in the other court filings of a pro se plaintiff.”
  • \[T]he court should consider allegations contained in the other court filings of a pro se plaintiff.\
  • “A pretrial detainee’s right not to be punished is at least as expansive as a convicted prisoner’s freedom from cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Kanne, Eschbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.