Skip to main content
· 1/4/1996

James River Corp. of Virginia v. Hallmark Cards

Citations

  • 915 F. Supp. 968
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 331
  • 1996 WL 14356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where no evidence shows the infringer stopped selling the allegedly infringing product even after the patentee filed the complaint, a court may draw the inference that the infringer would have continued to sell the infringing product even if the patentee had brought suit earlier”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stadtmueller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.