· 1/4/1996
James River Corp. of Virginia v. Hallmark Cards
Citations
- 915 F. Supp. 968
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 331
- 1996 WL 14356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where no evidence shows the infringer stopped selling the allegedly infringing product even after the patentee filed the complaint, a court may draw the inference that the infringer would have continued to sell the infringing product even if the patentee had brought suit earlier”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stadtmueller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.