James Richard Terrovona v. Lawrence Kincheloe, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Stone barred federal habeas review of claim that “incriminating statement” made incident to warrantless arrest in petitioner’s- home “must be suppressed as fruit of this illegal seizure”
• noting that the 6 opportunity for full and fair litigation “also consider[s] the extent to which the claims were 7 briefed before and considered by the state trial and appellate courts”
• noting that the opportunity for 9 full and fair litigation “also consider[s] the extent to which the claims were briefed before and 10 considered by the state trial and appellate courts”
• incriminating statement properly admitted when defendant understands his rights and does not indicate that he wishes to remain silent
• finding Fourth Amendment warrantless arrest 3 claim raised in federal habeas action to be barred by Stone v. Powell
• incriminating statement properly admitted when defendant understands his rights and does not indicate that he wishes to remain silent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).