James R. Snyder v. Ag Trucking, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that promises, including a statement that “ ‘all employees are treated fairly,’” were “not sufficiently specific to induce reliance”
• holding that directing a verdict for employer on claim for willful violation of ADEA was harmless error because, given jury's rejection of underlying ADEA claim, it \could not\ have found willful violation of ADEA
• applying Rule 103 to a mid-trial order sustaining an objection to certain questions from counsel
• statement that “there would be a place” for the employee in a new company was too general to create a promise
• “[P]ublication to plaintiff’s attorney is not publication to a third party, at least when the communication pertains to the matter for which the attorney was retained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).