James R. Odle v. Margaret H. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an 20 ALJ may consider evidence of “control of . . . pain that was satisfactory”
• holding that denial of benefits 7 was proper where the claimant’s impairments were responsive to medication
• concluding substantial evidence supported a denial of benefits and noting that treatment addressed claimant’s impairments
• emphasizing that the medical evidence established the plaintiff had a good response to treatments for his underlying impairments
• noting that an ALJ may 15 consider whether treatment produced a fair response or control of pain which was satisfactory
• affirming denial of benefits and noting that 21 the claimant’s impairments were controlled with medication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).