James R. King v. Illinois State Board of Elections, David E. Murray, Lawrence E. Johnson v. Bobby Rush, Timuel Black, Al Johnson, Intervening

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in such cases, the party would not “deserve” fees
• stating that in such cases, the party would not “deserve” fees
• awarding fees to interveners because it promoted goals of fee-shifting provisions of the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act
• awarding fees to intervenors because it promoted goals of fee-shifting provisions of the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act
• surveying caselaw and concluding that “defendant-intervenors are, in some circumstances, entitled to attorneys’ fees under fee-shifting statutes”
• determining prevailing-party status party by party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).