Skip to main content
· 8/1/2002

James R. Hall, III v. Gary Community School Corporation

Citations

  • 298 F.3d 672
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15426
  • 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,149
  • 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 859
  • 2002 WL 1767385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court properly granted employer judgment as a matter of law following jury’s verdict in plaintiffs favor where plaintiff did not offer evidence showing the reasons given by his employer were not worthy of credence or other evidence showing retaliation
  • holding that district court properly granted employer judgment as a matter of law following jury’s verdict in plaintiff’s favor where plaintiff did not offer evidence showing the rea- sons given by his employer were not worthy of credence or other evidence showing retaliation
  • the burden shifting framework is “unnecessary when review- ing judgments as a matter of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Rovner, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.