James R. Frye v. Huntington Alloys Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner’s claim that he “will be arrested upon his return to China” failed to overcome the BIA’s denial of CAT relief
• holding that the concept of torture is more severe than persecution
• explaining that, for purposes of CAT relief, the concept of torture 3 21-1327 is more severe than persecution
• noting that “it would be a strange rule if the absence or presence of a broken arm were the dispositive fact”
• noting that “it would be a strange rule if the absence or presence of a broken arm were the dispositive fact”
• explaining that torture “is more severe than persecution” (quoting Nuru v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 1207, 1224 (9th Cir. 2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).